Yes, while working my way through the cobwebs of conditioning and reclaiming sovereignty for every single aspect of my life, I want to keep up the compassion for infancy and toddlerhood, during which every single one of us was NOT sovereign, but entirely dependent on our caregivers belief systems and eating them up in order to ensure survival. Thank you for all your writing, I am inspired !
Fantastic article Alicen! Thanks for the reminder of the term hylic, hadn't seen or heard anyone mention it recently. Very timely revival of the term..especially since we are under grave spiritual attack including the potential energetic consequences of the quackxxine injected into billions of people.
On another note, thanks for linking to the article regarding psuedoskeptics. The statement "A Skeptic rightfully requests extraordinary evidence to support extraordinary claims", was popularized by Carl Sagan. This in fact NOT the case. It is a long twisty tale to sort this out but part of the problem is the lack of defined terms. Bottom line, an extraordinary claim only requires ordinary evidence to be sufficient. If strong supporting evidence supports any claim enough to corroborate the claim, then it is not relevant whether the evidence is extraordinary or ordinary..it simply does the job. Understanding this really shines a light on the bias of skeptics and the mainstream agenda to discredit that which does not support materialist paradigm or prevailing manufactured mainstream narrative. For a deeper dive here is a couple articles to explore:
Yes, while working my way through the cobwebs of conditioning and reclaiming sovereignty for every single aspect of my life, I want to keep up the compassion for infancy and toddlerhood, during which every single one of us was NOT sovereign, but entirely dependent on our caregivers belief systems and eating them up in order to ensure survival. Thank you for all your writing, I am inspired !
Fantastic article Alicen! Thanks for the reminder of the term hylic, hadn't seen or heard anyone mention it recently. Very timely revival of the term..especially since we are under grave spiritual attack including the potential energetic consequences of the quackxxine injected into billions of people.
On another note, thanks for linking to the article regarding psuedoskeptics. The statement "A Skeptic rightfully requests extraordinary evidence to support extraordinary claims", was popularized by Carl Sagan. This in fact NOT the case. It is a long twisty tale to sort this out but part of the problem is the lack of defined terms. Bottom line, an extraordinary claim only requires ordinary evidence to be sufficient. If strong supporting evidence supports any claim enough to corroborate the claim, then it is not relevant whether the evidence is extraordinary or ordinary..it simply does the job. Understanding this really shines a light on the bias of skeptics and the mainstream agenda to discredit that which does not support materialist paradigm or prevailing manufactured mainstream narrative. For a deeper dive here is a couple articles to explore:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099700/
https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/extraordinary-claims-require-extraordinary-evidence
“There’s a search bar?” 😂
Thank you, as always, for yet another red pill disguised as a Substack post. 👏
Thank you.